When Family Comes First, Justice Comes Last, Clemency Corrupted
Abusing clemency for personal gain erodes trust in democracy, blurs justice, and signals the dangerous normalisation of political favouritism at the highest levels.
This week, a series of documents surfaced that have thrust the issue of executive clemency into the limelight, raising profound questions about the moral and legal boundaries of presidential power. These documents, widely circulated on social media and endorsed by figures with significant influence, illustrate a deeply troubling trend in the use of presidential pardons as tools of political and personal absolution. The implications extend far beyond the borders of the United States, serving as a cautionary tale for democracies worldwide.
The documents reveal two strikingly similar acts of clemency: one signed by President Joseph R. Biden Jr.,1 offering unconditional pardons to several members of his family, and another by former President Donald J. Trump2, absolving Charles Kushner, his son-in-law’s father, of past convictions. These acts are not isolated; they represent a broader erosion of accountability within the highest echelons of power. They expose how the constitutional provision of clemency, designed as a mechanism for justice and mercy, can be weaponised for personal or political gain.
The Biden document, alleged to grant clemency for nonviolent offences to members of his inner circle, arrives amid intensifying scrutiny by Republican lawmakers who have labeled his family as a "crime syndicate."3 Endorsements by figures like Elon Musk amplify the narrative4, framing the issue as emblematic of a deeper rot within American governance. While the Biden administration has not confirmed the document's authenticity, its dissemination has fueled accusations of nepotism and ethical compromise.
Similarly, the pardon issued by Trump for Charles Kushner, a businessman who pled guilty to tax evasion, illegal campaign contributions, and witness tampering5, underscores the potential for clemency to be wielded as a shield for allies. This act is particularly jarring given the subsequent nomination of Kushner for an ambassadorship6, suggesting a system where loyalty, rather than merit, dictates appointments to positions of immense diplomatic consequence.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Gunpowder Chronicles to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.